 |
|
|
| As head of passive safety at Ford, Joerg
Reim is responsible for the less obvious design features
that often turn out to be the life-savers |

Joerg Reim |
 |
| “If people in a car are not
using seatbelts, then secondary safety features are of
a lesser advantage” |
|
Vehicle safety starts on the drawing board when the design lines of
a new model are being sketched and is far more detailed than whether
a car should have ABS brakes as standard or how many airbags should
be fitted.
As well as the safety features detailed in a new model brochure, “hidden”
safety initiatives are design essentials built into a vehicle, such
as energy absorption measures and the construction of space below
the bonnet to improve occupant and pedestrian safety in the event
of a crash.
Therefore, in the case of an all-new model, safety elements of a vehicle
are being worked on up to four years before the vehicle reaches production
and around two-and-a-half-years in the case of a model update.
“When we are designing new vehicles we are talking about the
stringent implementation and development of safety features which
includes testing and development with computer engineering methods
from A-Z,” says Ford safety expert Joerg Reim.
“The structure of a vehicle plays a very important role in overall
safety – not too stiff and not too soft. We have to find the
balance between stiffness and softness. An accident occurs in the
blink of an eye – 200,000th of a second. When your eye blinks
the accident is over and within that amount of time the vehicle structure
and the secondary systems need to work together to provide optimum
protection.
“We have to manage the forward movement and protection of occupants
and other road users within one metre. Therefore, development is focused
on the chassis and engine of a vehicle. The smaller the engine, for
example, the greater protection because there is more space. We are
also developing breakaway chassis technology. Customers don’t
see all the safety features incorporated into vehicles.
“There is significant work under the skin of a vehicle that
contributes to the integrity of vehicles in the event of a collision.”
Reim is Ford of Europe’s supervisor vehicle safety, body engineering
product development Europe, based in Cologne, and is responsible for
vehicle safety and crash development from the first design lines until
certification.
There are two categories of vehicle safety – passive and active.
Reim is responsible for passive safety, which covers features designed
to protect in the event of an accident, such as seatbelts, airbags,
vehicle structure and rescuability – all part of Ford’s
unique Intelligent Protection System (IPS) pioneered on the Mondeo.
Meanwhile, active safety embraces features designed to aid drivers
in the avoidance of an accident such as brakes, lights, vehicle visibility
and more recent features such as Electronic Stability Programme (ESP),
Electronic Brake Force Distribution (EBFD) and Emergency Brake Assist
(EBA).
Despite the amount of time and money spent on building safety features
into the design of a vehicle, Reim classes a near 50-year-old invention
as the most important.
“The seatbelt is the most important safety feature,” he
argues. “If people in a car are not using seatbelts, then secondary
safety features are of a lesser advantage.” From the launch
of the lap belt developments have seen the introduction of a three-point
seatbelt, inertia reel belts, load-limiters on belts and the addition
of seatbelt pretensioners.
However, seatbelt developments continue apace with Reim saying: “The
next development will be seatbelts with double pretensioners to keep
occupants tighter to the seat in the event of an accident.
“We want to ‘tie’ the occupant to the seat and the
body structure so there is relatively little movement of the person
inside the passenger compartment.”
Other developments are focusing around four-point belts, padded belts
to protect the upper torso and in the future could include harness-style
belts as used by racing drivers.
The widespread introduction of airbags in the 1990s has contributed
significantly to the reduction of serious injuries, with Reim believing
that the introduction of curtain airbags was one of the key developments,
as their launch has specifically reduced the number of head injuries.
He says: “There are more frontal impacts than side impacts,
but more people are killed or seriously injured as a result of side
impacts. Therefore, today, protecting the driver and passengers from
side impacts is more important as they are already very well protected
in the event of a frontal impact.”
The inflation rates of airbags can already be tailored to the severity
of the impact and future developments could see the fitting of knee
and foot airbags as standard. For rear seat passengers they would
be incorporated in the backs of the front seats.
Ford is also looking at the development of so-called “out-of-position
airbags”. Reim explains: “Passengers may not be sitting
in the optimum position when an accident occurs so while an airbag
will inflate, it may not offer maximum protection. We are, therefore,
incorporating airbags which are ‘out-of-position-friendly’
into vehicles.”
Experts believe that building safety into a car is about building
space into a vehicle. While Reim explains how that is being achieved
under the bonnet with, for example, smaller engines, it is also being
achieved inside vehicles through the development of anti-submarining
seats, steering wheel retraction and pedals moving away from the driver
in an accident.
“If we can build more space into the occupant compartment we
can reduce the severity of injuries. Initially we looked at reducing
head and chest injuries because invariably they are the most life
threatening,” he says.
“Now we have the technology to protect the head and chest we
have moved on to other areas such as protecting the legs of drivers
and passengers by reducing intrusions into the passenger compartment
in a collision.” Longer term, Reim believes the focus will switch
from the launch of new passive safety features to active safety features.

The Ford Mondeo |
 |
| “The widespread introduction of
airbags in the 1990s has contributed significantly to the reduction
of serious injuries” |
“We have achieved a high level of performance with respect to
passive safety. Therefore, I think significant new developments will
focus around active safety and particularly the early warning of danger,”
he says. Such developments will include the availability of so-called
driveby- wire technology and sensors in the front of vehicles warning
of the rapid approach of an obstacle.
The launch of the European New Car Assessment Programme in the late
1990s has done much to focus the public on the protection offered
to drivers, passengers and pedestrians in the event of an accident.
However, Ford, just like other manufacturers, completes its own significant
crash test programme before a vehicle is launched. The Euro NCAP test
covers frontal, side and pedestrian impacts, while Ford has many more
in-house crash tests.
Reim says: “Euro NCAP is important to us, but it is not the
only test. Manufacturers can influence safety, but so can other road
users, governments and local authorities through signage and road
design improvements.
“We are working on a lot of technical innovations to improve
vehicle safety from the point of view of drivers, passengers, pedestrians
and other road users. There are many issues which contribute to road
safety and there continues to be room for improvement.” |
|
|