The majority of companies are failing in their
duty to manage occupational road risk and must instigate a safety
culture, says Britain’s leading fleet insurers.
Ashley Martin reports |

Zurich’s
John Briggs |
 |
| “A staggering 97% of businesses
don’t check their employees’ driving history
and if their cence is in order before they get into a
car” |
|
Companies must adopt a risk management culture if there is to
be a significant reduction in the number of road traffic accidents
involving at-work drivers. That is the view of the nation’s
largest fleet insurer, Norwich Union, which claims that 85% of the
UK’s fleets are not even carrying out basic risk management
processes. A similar view comes from Zurich, the UK’s second-largest
fleet insurer, which says that a staggering 97% of businesses don’t
check their employees’ driving history and if their licence
is in order before they get into a car.
The shock disclosures that the vast majority of Britain’s
fleets are not undertaking the “basic package” of fundamental
risk management measures – embracing staff driving licence
checks, issuing driver handbooks, investigating accidents and pre-employment
checks of driver competency and experience – should send alarm
bells ringing throughout companies and boardrooms. It is even more
amazing when it is considered that about a third of all road accidents
involve at-work drivers, resulting in 20 fatalities and 250 serious
injuries each week, according to Department for Transport figures.
Kevin Edwards, Norwich Union’s head of motor underwriting,
says: “Data from 12,000 of our fleet policyholders revealed
that only 15% were implementing a programme of fundamental risk
management measures. In addition, less than half of the 15% currently
undertaking basic risk management are not using any form of on-going
driver-training programme to help improve driver performance and
minimise risk.”
Of the 85% of fleets who appeared to be taking no action and ignoring
the raft of legislation, advice and protocols as well as newspaper
and magazine headlines, Mr Edwards says: “They might be undertaking
one or two initiatives within the basic package, but no more.”
Overall, he concludes: “Fleets still have a long way to go
in terms of using effective risk management. There just isn’t
a risk management culture among the majority of people who operate
fleets in the UK. That is not to say there have not been improvements,
but it is a very slow process.
“We do see improvements in some fleets’ accident records
year-on-year and it is awareness and publicity that is encouraging
action.” Zurich’s survey of 200 businesses with turnover
of between £1m and £20m highlighted that, while 41%
of fleets evaluated a car for its work suitability, less than a
quarter of those surveyed undertook any form of roadbased driver
training or assessment and only 8% undertook web-based driver assessment
and training.

Norwich’s
Kevin Edwards |
 |
| “Too many fleets only look
for the cheapest insurance premium. We are trying to change
that outlook and commodity mentality …” |
|
Given that both surveys highlight significant risk management inadequacies
in the majority of small, medium and large fleets it is puzzling
that numerous industry surveys – notably the annual Fleet
News New Year survey – highlight risk management and duty
of care as the key issues facing the industry in 2004. John Briggs,
motor manager for Zurich Commercial UK, which insures in excess
of 600,000 fleet vehicles, says: “Awareness is growing among
fleet operators that they have a health and safety responsibility
towards their employees who drive on business. They should look
at risk management as a legal and social responsibility; that should
be their key motivator for introducing a risk programme.
“Businesses are worried about the dangers that their employees
can face while driving on business, but not enough are doing something
about it. We are urging employers to look at developing a fleet
safety culture. Employers need to take control of managing driver
safety by assessing their drivers’ awareness and acting on
the information. There is a need to take action.” Zurich says
that companies’ health and safety policy should include work-related
road safety, there must be high-level buy-in for the policy to function
and the policy must be communicated to all staff so employees know
what is expected of them.
Unfortunately, says Mr Edwards, too much fleet management emphasis
is placed on the vehicle – on the road price, performance,
ride and handling and available features – and not enough
on the driver. “We want to see a cultural change which sees
the fleet management balance between the car and the driver shift.
It is about looking after people when they are driving and not all
about procurement and disposal of vehicles,” he says. Mr Edwards
wants more insurers and brokers to highlight risk management techniques
and programmes when discussing insurance premium renewals with fleets.
He also says companies should stop treating insurance as a commodity.
“Too many fleets only look for the cheapest insurance premium.
We are trying to change that outlook and commodity mentality so
that risk management is higher up the escalator, but it is an evolutionary
process,” he says. “We are trying to focus on encouraging
fleets to put the risk management basics in place because that is
where the process starts. “We actively look to find out whether
clients are managing the risk because that can have a significant
impact on premiums.” Although it is difficult to quantify
exact premium savings as a result of an on-going risk management
programme, Norwich Union says that premium savings of 20-30% are
not uncommon as a result of improved claims experience. Add on to
this the numerous other bottom line benefits and the financial savings
for fleet are numerous.
 |
| “We want to reward wellmanaged
risks and to do that we first need to know the real-life
risk level” |
|
Zurich suggests that the “hidden” costs of vehicle
damage could be up to 30 times the cost of the damage, with Mr Briggs
saying: “There are significant cost-saving motivators for
being pro-active on risk as well as boosting staff morale, reducing
staff sickness levels and delivery delays and addressing the negative
impact on the company’s reputation caused by road accidents.”
It is, therefore, strange that despite the publicity, the financial
savings and numerous warnings that the legislative noose is tightening
around the necks of companies, fleets and their directors, the vast
majority of the UK’s fleets appear to have adopted an ostrich-like
mentality to improving their health and safety record.
Although there has been a slow growth in risk management in recent
years, Norwich Union says there is a distinct difference between
the approach of large and small fleet operators. “The very
large operators tend to employ dedicated motor fleet managers. However,
small and medium enterprises, with the exception of some hauliers,
often do not have the benefit of such expertise in-house. The situation
is worsened by the prevailing attitude among many small fleet operators
that risk management does not apply to them. They fail to understand
their liability for the safety of their drivers and potential cost
benefits of implementing basic measures,” says Mr Edwards.
| The
savings that companies gain by implementing a fleet safety
strategy
- A management of increases in insurance premiums leading
to savings of at least 15% depending on previous claims
record, fleet size and composition at a time when insurance
premiums are escalating at the rate of 20-30% annually
- Protection from prosecution
- Fewer accidents
- Less need for investigation
- Fuel consumption improvements of at least 7%
- Reductions of at least 5% in wear and tear on tyres, brakes
and clutches etc
- Improved vehicle value of a minimum of 4% if a trained
driver drives the car
- Improved business performance
- Less paperwork
- Less lost time
- Less requirement for work rescheduling
- Lower training costs
- Fewer missed orders
- Improved staff morale
- Improved public image
The costs faced by companies that fail
to implement a fleet safety strategy
- It is estimated that each fatality costs society more
than £1m, including over £300,000 in lost output
- Increased insurance premiums
- Claims administration
- Possible legal action
- Hire car cost
- Hire car administration
- High tyre wear
- High fuel consumption
- Poor vehicle residual values
- Towing charges
- Missed appointments
- Poor company image
- Late deliveries
- Lost staff time for injuries
- Stressed staff
|
In an effort to overcome such resistance, Norwich Union’s
risk advisers – who see 1,500-1,800 customers a year –
and brokers working on the company’s behalf are increasingly
looking to hold meetings with financial directors as they hold the
purse strings. “We recognise that there needs to be more emphasis
on the financials and the benefits that risk management can produce.
But as well as our risk advisers we rely on our brokers to promote
fleet safety and it is a case of teaching the brokers,” he
says.
 |
| RAC data predict that over five
years, driver training can reduce accidents within any
given company by up to 70% |
|
A potential stumbling block to brokers being encouraged to work
with fleets to reduce risk is that many brokers earn commission
based on the premium charged – the higher the premium, the
higher the commission. However, says Mr Edwards, some brokers were
addressing that issue themselves and were now operating on a fee
system based on the service provided to a client. He adds: “For
many small and medium fleets, some of the risk management processes
may be daunting and their introduction will involve a lot of work
and controls, but doing the basics is better than doing nothing.
“When we write policies we are not just looking at claims
experience, but whether accidents are down to bad luck or judgement.
A good underwriter will be trying to find out whether an incident
was bad luck or the company could see it coming and didn’t
react. If a fleet does not do the basics they will not find us very
accommodating, but if an incident was unfortunate we will look favourably
on them.”
Some fleets have looked to self-insure in an attempt to contain
or reduce costs but, argues Mr Edwards, such a move is invariably
false economy. “A small minority of large fleet operators
self-insure, but it is within a total risk management environment
otherwise such a move is very cost inefficient,” he says.
Another major fleet insurer, AIG Europe, has established a policy
called Fleet Protector through which independent total vehicle risk
management company Risk Answers undertakes twice-a-year fleet assessment
and risk management reports.
AIG Europe says that companies that pro-actively manage their
fleet by implementing risk reduction measures will be rewarded with
controllable claims costs. AIG Europe senior underwriter Guy Fraser
says: “We want to reward well-managed risks and to do that
we first need to know the real-life risk level. That is why we have
engaged Risk Answers to carry out bi-annual fleet assessments. Their
assessors will talk to company management to discover where the
risk problem areas are in relation to the fleet and then analyse
working practices and find solutions.”
Jeremy Hay, Risk Answers’ Chief Executive, says: “Some
fleets will become uninsurable unless they take action to manage
their risk exposure. Pro-active risk management in conjunction with
expert help and analysis will make the difference.” Last September,
Zurich launched a new Road Awareness Programme in conjunction with
Drive & Survive, a long-time driver-training provider to the
insurance giant. Following an initial on-line individual driver
risk assessment recommendations will be made as to future requirements
which may be road or classroom-based.
In a bid to encourage fleets to “introduce the basics”
Norwich Union is shortly launching a new toolkit initiative designed
to give all their fleet customers access to practical risk management
advice. One thing is certain – in an increasingly litigious
society and a fast-growing compensation culture, injury awards will
get bigger and bigger. Therefore, says Mr Edwards: “It is
in the interests of both ourselves and our customers to minimise
their risks.”
|

|
| Risk management –
the bottom line benefits As corporate governance and
duty of care obligations become more onerous, risk management
has risen sharply up most fleet manager’s agendas, according
to industry surveys. While fleet running costs represent a
significant amount of corporate spend, good risk management
will improve business efficiency, reduce costs and –
through more careful driving practice – improve the
long-term residual value of the fleet.
Reducing accidents – driver training
In theory: With the latest statistics
showing that all company vehicle drivers have a 30-50% chance
of having an accident every year, an efficient driver training
policy makes sound economic sense. RAC data predict that over
five years, driver training can reduce accidents within any
given company by up to 70%.
In practice: For a fleet of 100
drivers with training courses typically costing between £100
and £200, the total cost of driver-training can easily
top £20,000 a year. A permanent driver-trainer can be
used to provide top-up training, accompany drivers on ad-hoc
quality checks and vet temporary drivers and agency staff
when recruiting. Especially if this is carried out alongside
a main job role, in-house driver-training can work out cheaper
and more effective than outsourcing.
Reducing the fuel bill – economy
driving
In theory: Economy driving courses
aims to improve fuel consumption, extend tyre life, and reduce
maintenance and running costs. Encouraging staff not to accelerate
from traffic lights and roundabouts and brake sharply has
obvious benefits for accident rates and parts costs such as
brake discs and tyres, and improves the residual value of
a vehicle. Getting those extra miles per litre can lead to
considerable cost savings when spread across the entire fleet.
In practice: A private car fleet
operator in the Midlands saved 16% off their annual fuel costs
after sending 314 fleet drivers through a fuel efficiency
training programme. Straightforward advice and training in
advanced driver techniques, such as looking further ahead
on the road to avoid sharp braking and better use of gears,
was delivered on a one-to-one basis. More efficient driving
has also been proven to provide financial benefit to the business
in the form of reduced maintenance costs.
More efficient route planning –
telematics
In theory: Fleet management systems
such as Fleetstar from Cybit, provide real-time vehicle tracking
and monitoring which can be a valuable tool for identifying
offenders and to monitor improvements. Features such as real-time
traffic information, journey playback, planned routing, mapping
to street level and mileage tracking can all produce impressive
cost savings and efficiency gains.
In practice: A building services
company in East Anglia with a fleet of 250 vehicles offering
building maintenance and repairs, invested in telematics for
120 vehicles in 2002. Through more efficient route planning,
making vehicles pay for themselves by avoiding dead time on
the road, looking at traffic flow and vehicle suitability,
and maximising just-in-time processes, the company has saved
over £90,000 in fuel costs.
Better control of staff driving behaviour
In theory: As well as identifying
problem drivers to allocate training resources more efficiently,
telematics also allows fleet managers to set limits for drivers
such as mileage, the number of hours spent behind the wheel
and adherence to speed limits. Even the most advanced driver
training will have little impact if the employee is exhausted
from an over-demanding schedule, with early starts, late finishes
and long distances to drive in between. Telematics also helps
companies to keep a much sharper control of the mobile workforce,
including validating personal expenses claims.
In practice: One customer had
tagged the local Tescos to appear on exception reports once
it transpired that some employees were doing their weekly
shop in company time. Another customer discovered half of
the salesforce were meeting up on Friday afternoons in a local
pub. Staff were advised that this practice was unacceptable
and telematics devices successfully used to bar the salesforce,
with a resultant increase in productivity. In a separate case,
a third party who was involved in a motor accident was claiming
a six-figure sum from a dispatch company for personal injury
including whiplash, loss of earnings and even loss of sexual
performance. Telematics data collected from the fleet vehicle,
which was alleged to have hit the third party vehicle at excessive
speed, proved that the actual speed of impact was less than
5 mph. The actual payment to the third party was less than
£2,000.
Keeping up to date with legislation
In theory: Insurers are a good
source of up-to-date information on constantly changing European
Union legislation – and the associated fines.
In practice: A specialist courier
company delivering props, mobile laundries and dressing rooms
to the film and television industry in London operated a fleet
of nearly 70 cars, vans and light goods vehicles. A substantial
fine was avoided after a risk assessment highlighted that
two drivers were driving illegally, following changes to licence
legislation.
Vehicle maintenance
In theory: Making sure vehicles
are well maintained will mean that they are safer and hold
their price better, but cleaning them at sales time can also
prove profitable.
In practice: Research by Norwich
Union has shown that valeting vehicles at a cost of £100
per vehicle can improve residual value by up to £500
at disposal.
Source: Norwich Union
|
|