| A Vauxhall-sponsored survey into light commercial
vehicles has uncovered some surprising
findings – and highlights ways in which management can
improve their safety record |
 |
| “It does not appear that
organisations are moving quickly enough to provide LCV
training” |
|
Light commercial vehicle fleets are becoming more safety orientated,
but as the authorities’ focus on occupational driving increases
smaller fleets lag significantly behind larger operations.
That is one of the major conclusions of the Vauxhall-sponsored
“Light Commercial Vehicle Trends 2004” report, written
by Professor Peter Cooke of the Centre for Automotive Industries
Management, Nottingham Business School, The Nottingham Trent University.
The report also contains the findings of a survey based on 310 responses
from LCV fleet operators operating more than 110,000 LCVs. Surprisingly,
41% of survey respondents claimed that the accident rate for LCVs
on their fleet was better than that for company cars, with 29% claiming
it was worse than that for cars and a similar number saying it was
identical.
Given the discrepancy in accident rates it is surprising that
only 5% of respondents said they had specific LCV insurance packages,
with half of companies saying LCV cover was part of general business
insurance and 39% saying it was included within business car cover.
Only 3% of fleets self-insure. Despite increases in insurance premiums
in recent years, the area is one of the least researched and understood
areas of fleet management, and LCV management in particular. In
many cases, LCV fleet insurance is tacked on to the end of the car
fleet, or even on to the company’s general insurance rather
than treated as a separate topic and risk.
With many companies claiming their LCV fleet has a better accident
record than their company car fleet, the report questions whether
such statistics are brought to the attention of the broker or the
insurance company. As a result, the report urges fleets to compile
a full operating profile of their LCVs and present it to their insurer.
It adds: “Insurance brokers are rarely known to refuse premiums
so it is the role of the LCV fleet manager or the finance department
to challenge the quotations or proposals to establish what is the
best package for the LCV fleet. Insurance purchase, with strategic
risk management, needs to be pursued aggressively – and the
results monitored continually.”
Driver training for LCV drivers is on the rise with 48% of organisations
providing some form of training, compared with 43% a year ago. However,
larger fleets dominate the provision of driver training with the
report concluding that “any form of LCV driver training is
lamentably low among smaller fleet operations – yet the liabilities
are the same”. The report continues: “Given the increasing
importance attached to duty of care issues and the interest of the
Health and Safety Executive in business vehicles, it does not appear
that organisations are moving quickly enough to provide LCV training.
If the training is not provided voluntarily, there is always a possibility
it may become compulsory.” Fleets deploy a wide range of driving
licence checks, with 61% saying they carry out checks once a year,
19% twice a year and 11% randomly.
However, even though six in 10 fleets carry out annual checks,
the report asks whether that is often enough – just 1% of
fleets surveyed undertake monthly checks. The report says: “The
growth in the national collection of speed cameras means the LCV
driver is just as likely as the business car driver to collect penalty
points – and they can rapidly reach the disqualification status.
It is all too easy for a driver to seek not to inform the employer
of accumulated points in the hope that they will be able to continue
without further offence until the points, or disqualification, can
be lifted.
“Driving licences need to be checked physically –
both parts – on a regular basis. Quarterly licence checking
may well be best practice in terms of countering the short-term
disqualification periods. It is also important that the licences
of other members of the family are checked too, particularly in
the light of the growth of benefit-in-kind vans instead of cars.”
The report also underlines the importance of checking the driving
licences of new staff before employment is offered. In compiling
the report businesses were asked for their corporate attitudes to
parking and speeding offences by LCV drivers.
 |
| “While the LCV operating
industry has matured rapidly, there remain many developments
needed to keep it abreast with client demands” |
|
While 74% of respondents would expect drivers to pay their parking
fines, the remainder would appear to have a flexible policy and
12% of these would pay the fine depending on the circumstances.
The report comments that, in reality, parking fines are increasingly
becoming accepted as part of the cost of doing business and, to
retain staff, the business will have to pay – eventually.
Attitudes towards speeding offences are somewhat tighter, with 44%
of respondents paying their own fine and 40% undergoing a disciplinary
interview. No organisation admits to paying speeding fines, although
4% will review according to the circumstances.
More fleets have formal policies regarding LCVs and drug and alcohol
abuse this year than 12 months ago. Only 12% of fleets admitted
they had no policy in relation to alcohol abuse – all sub
500-vehicle fleets – compared with 21% in 2003. Meanwhile,
15% of companies admitted they had no drug-driving policy, with
smaller fleets the main offenders. Surprisingly, given the amount
of publicity in relation to the December 2003 introduction of a
ban on the use of hand-held mobile phones while driving, 20% of
fleets said they had no formal policy on phone use by LCV drivers.
Once again it is the smaller fleets which typically do not have
procedures in place.
The report comments: “Despite regular reports of accidents
in which a mobile phone might have been involved, there is still
a certain cavalier attitude towards their use. Of all the obvious
issues to be led from the top, use of mobile phones while driving
is one where senior management should set an example.” A strong
corporate image is frequently acknowledged by companies as a key
ingredient in them winning and retaining business. Often vans may
be the only tangible evidence that the company exists which the
client ever sees. Therefore, a clean vehicle, well-maintained and
tidy inside and out, can be a strong image builder.
“The vehicle need not be the most up-to-date model on current
plates, provided it is smart and clearly shows the driver takes
pride in it. This will reflect on corporate image – and ultimately,
business success,” says the report. Although 80% of companies
say they have a formal policy on LCV condition, it is mainly smaller
fleets which don’t. The report concludes that while the LCV
operating industry has matured rapidly, there remain many developments
required to keep it abreast with client requirements and demands.
Among those issues are greater attention to the driver and the
driver’s well being. The report says: “This is more
than just duty of care – it is increasingly being realised
that the driver is an integral part of the business and they expect
the same care and support given to business car users.” Further
information about the report is available from the Vauxhall vans
hotline: 0870 010 0651.
| Assessing unique
issues
Interactive Driving Systems has extended its range of on-line
driver assessment tools for car, truck, van and bus drivers
to include a RoadRISK assessment specifically for van and
truck drivers involved in multi-drop operations in the UK,
continental Europe, the US and Australia. The new assessment
focuses on the unique issues faced by multi-drop drivers,
such as frequent stops and starts, manoeuvring, driving at
slower speeds in congested traffic and dealing with a wide
range of other road users in densely-populated urban areas.
The first UK-based trial of the new multi-drop system is
being undertaken by Ryder Logistics on one of its retail home
delivery contracts. As well as home delivery, the assessment
is claimed to be relevant to any truck or van-based multi-drop
operation, including courier, postal, parcel, retail, logistics,
haulage and service operations. Andy Cuerden, UK managing
director of Interactive Driving Systems, says: “As well
as the specific and difficult driving conditions faced by
multi-drop drivers, there are also some particular issues
faced by managers of this group of drivers, including the
‘white van man’ stereotype, high use of agency
and casual staff, limited licensing and drivers’ hours
requirements, unsociable hours and high staff turnover often
of relatively young high-risk drivers.”
Based on an on-going study of 13,000 drivers by Napier University,
the on-line RoadRISK assessment of attitude, hazard perception,
knowledge, behaviour, personality and personal exposure can
be used to identify drivers most at risk. The study found
that 35% of the sample was responsible for over 95% of the
crashes. It also found drivers with the worst scores were
between three-16 times more at risk than those with the highest
scores. As a result, Interactive Driving Systems claims that
the RoadRISK assessment is a low-cost tool with many pre-recruitment,
in-employment and other uses for multidrop drivers who, it
claims, are a particularly high-risk group.
Mr Cuerden continues: “RoadRISK Multi Drop is the
first in many steps we have planned to provide targeted solutions
for our clients to ensure that we can help them identify the
risks and training needs associated with their specific activities.
The vans and rigid vehicles used for home, parcel and small
store deliveries are very different to the large articulated
vehicles we see on our motorways.”
|
|