| North Wales chief constable and RoadSafe board
member Richard Brunstrom is one of Britain’s most high-profile
policemen. Ashley Martin went to meet him and discovered that
the police focus on at-work driving is set to increase dramatically |
Richard Brunstrom |
 |
| “Police officers attending
road crashes will record, for the first time, if the
journey was for work purposes” |
|
The road is a workplace and employers have a statutory duty to
ensure that the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 is complied
with, says Richard Brunstrom, chief constable of North Wales Police,
head of roads policing on behalf of the Association of Chief Police
Officers and a RoadSafe board member.
However, industry figures suggest, alarmingly, that around 75%
of Britain’s businesses do not have an occupational road
risk policy in place. Mr Brunstrom – chief constable of North
Wales Police for four years, having started his 25-year police
career in Sussex and served in Greater Manchester and Cleveland – believes
the complacency of companies to give similar health and safety
protection to their at-work drivers as they do to staff when, for
example, in the office, working at a machine or on a construction
site is due to:
- A lack of awareness of legislation already on the statute
book – despite the reams of publicity that the management
of occupational road risk has been given since the government-appointed
Work-related Road Safety Task Group (WRRSTG) reported its findings
four years ago
- A lack of audit
- A lack of enforcement
Until all three things change it is, says Mr Brunstrom, only
a vain hope to expect companies to voluntarily automatically introduce
measures to protect both themselves and their at-work drivers when
undertaking business-related journeys. But change is in the pipeline
and if companies do not take measures unilaterally to manage occupational
road risk, then the enforcing authorities, supported by an ever-increasing
amount of legislation, will target rogue companies.
In the meantime, the recent decision to change the Stats19 reporting
form used by police officers nationwide to record work-related
crashes (with the majority of incidents due to human error, Mr
Brunstrom does not use the word accident in relation to death and
injury on the highways), coupled with on-going Association of Chief
Police Officers (ACPO) discussions with the Health and Safety Executive
(HSE) on a protocol to investigate at-work driving incidents, it
means that businesses that fail to act will find themselves in
trouble.
 |
| “42 pursuit deaths is
far too many. It is many more people
than we shoot, but we have
not taken the same approach to road deaths” |
The long-expected rewording of the established Stats19 reporting
form is seen by Mr Brunstrom as a major breakthrough, with the
authorities finally discovering exactly how many work-related road
crashes there are annually. Police officers attending road
crashes will record, for the first time, if the journey was for
work purposes. Currently, estimates have been the only guide and
the WRRSTG calculated that of the 3,000 deaths and 300,000 injuries
suffered on the roads, up to one third could be the result of crashes
involving at-work drivers.
It is widely accepted that the most dangerous thing most people
do while at work is to drive, but precise casualty figures have
been unavailable. Detailed statistics from the Stats19 forms are
expected to be published for the first time next year. Meanwhile,
while work-related road safety “is not a frontline priority
for the HSE”, the organisation is working with the police
who, it says, are in a better position to enforce road traffic
legislation.
The change in Stats19 crash recording details, coupled with police
chiefs and the HSE working together to draw up protocols, means,
according to Mr Brunstrom, that: “As we get more aware of
the Health and Safety at Work Act, it is almost inevitable that
the police will be doing more work in this area.”
Officers
attending crashes will now record whether the journey was for
work purposes |
 |
| “Our investigations of a
road death should be the same standard as that of a murder” |
|
How the police and the HSE will tackle rogue companies is still
being discussed as part of the agreed protocol. But the twin track
approach – Stats19 and the protocol – will ideally
enable the police to take a “targeted” approach to
improving road safety and “weeding out the cowboys”,
as opposed to the preferred HSE strategy of a highly-visible, but
random approach – although this is still being discussed.
Using intelligence and data collected from the Stats19 forms will
enable police officers to build up a detailed picture of how companies
manage occupational road safety. While speed is known to be the single biggest killer on the nation’s
roads, the role that driver fatigue plays, for example, is unknown.
Stats19 data will enable a clearer picture to be drawn up. Without
doubt, says Mr Brunstrom, crashes that are the result of driver
fatigue and falling asleep at the wheel will result in police officers
studying work schedules and journey patterns as well as investigating
whether employees are fit and equipped to drive and are properly
trained to sit behind the wheel. Focus could even be applied to
employees’ lifestyle and whether a crash towards the end
of a long early morning drive was caused by a late night.
Mr Brunstrom says: “Society has not woken up to the fact
that the road is a workplace. Employers are going to have to change
their attitude and take this issue more seriously and that is good
news. “When we have gathered evidence from Stats19 there
will be some joint approach work by the HSE, backed by the police,
to re-educate companies. But we will then go looking for the ‘cowboy’ companies.” But,
in a plea to companies, Mr Brunstrom says: “Businesses should
start thinking about the Health and Safety at Work Act now and
how it applies to their business as far as their at-work drivers
are concerned so they are ahead of the enforcement agencies. Voluntary
compliance is better than legislative enforcement.
“Companies should treat the road as a place of work because
it is right to do so morally and from a business viewpoint and
not because the government is introducing more legislation. “We
want to identify the ‘cowboy’ operators by asking if
the company has a health and safety policy through an audit of
their procedures. If they have, we will go looking for someone
else, but it will mean the police and the HSE going knocking on
doors. “If we crack down on the worst operators and make
examples of a few major players, then overall occupational road
risk management and the standards of at-work driving will rise.
But there is no magic cure.”
Black box benefits
In-vehicle journey data recorders – black boxes – should
be fitted as standard on the production line by motor manufacturers,
according to high-profile North Wales chief constable Richard
Brunstrom. Both his own force and the Metropolitan Police
fit such devices as standard to police vehicles and he
says driver behaviour dramatically changes when they know
the technology is in place and their driving is being monitored.
However, despite the moral and ethical arguments in favour
of the systems, he understands the view promoted by many
fleet operators that the cost of retrospectively fitting
such devices outweighs the benefit.
That is why, says Mr Brunstrom, he is lobbying vehicle
manufacturers to fit the technology on the production line.
He adds: “The view of the majority of fleet managers
is short-sighted and parochial because the devices don’t
cost much, but there is not much of an enforcement regime.
However, the number of vehicles fitted with black boxes
is growing and we can prove that journey data recorders
can have significant benefits to an already well-managed
fleet and make good business sense. “Black boxes
will demonstrate whether drivers were driving appropriately
and they offer enormous benefits in terms of protecting
you and your drivers’ reputation. In the event of
a crash, it can show whether or not it was your employee’s
fault.”
His comments come as the number of crashes involving
police cars is under the spotlight, following 42 pursuit
deaths last year. “That is far too many. It is many
more people than we shoot, but we have not taken the same
approach to road deaths. We are more tolerant of deaths
on the roads. But that view must change and, therefore,
we must change the way we train our police drivers,” says
Mr Brunstrom, who, as part of his ACPO responsibilities
is in charge of police driver-training. Despite a highly-sophisticated
police driver-training programme and police pursuit process,
the number of road crashes resulting in deaths and serious
injuries has not reduced.
“We need to know why these incidents are happening.
I suspect sometimes it is the fault of the police. The
issue is on my agenda. I am looking at our driver-training
process and I will be taking the matter up with Home Office
ministers,” he says. “We will have to become
better at demonstrating what happened in a police-involved
collision and if it was a blameworthy collision. Killing
42 people a year is not acceptable.”
In addition to the fatalities, government figures reveal
that there were more than 20,000 incidents involving police
cars, vans or motorcyclists in England and Wales in 2003/04,
including vandalism and minor scrapes. When the numbers
were revealed earlier this year, Liberal Democrat MP and
the party’s home affairs spokesman Mark Oaten said: “For
their safety and our safety, police drivers should be on
regular refresher courses to keep them alert and aware
of the dangers.” More than half the police vehicles
in Derbyshire are fitted with data recorders and chief
inspector Paul Berry, of the force’s road policing
unit, said earlier this year that the technology helped
accident investigators gain as much technical information
as possible to help determine the cause of crashes. |
Separately, the police Road Death Investigation Manual, first
published in 2001, is being updated by the National Centre for
Policing Excellence. It sets the standard in England and Wales
for the investigation of fatal road crashes. Tougher sentences
for drivers convicted of causing a road crash are already being
studied by the government (see legislation) and Mr Brunstrom, who
was instrumental in producing the Manual, says: “Our investigations
of a road death should be the same standard as that of a murder,
but road deaths are not treated as seriously by the police. That
must change and the Manual will increasingly guarantee a top-flight
investigation to any road death of serious injury.”
 |
| “It is not simply about
enforcing road regulation, it is about denying criminals use
of the roads” |
Disappointingly, says Mr Brunstrom, the long-awaited Road Safety
Bill fell following the decision to hold a general election in
May. However, given the cross-party support for the measures it
contained and the return of a Labour government, he is pleased
it has since been re-introduced to Parliament. “There is
a definite need for some road safety legislation to back up the
government’s strategy and it was a big disappointment that
the Bill was a casualty of the election. However, since it has
been revived, I will be lobbying hard for tougher penalties for
drivers to be approved,” he says. Mr Brunstrom is also disappointed
with the draft Corporate Manslaughter Bill – many years in
the pipeline but “weak” in its content when published
earlier this year, he says. The top policeman will be lobbying both for the government to
introduce the legislation and toughen it up. The published Bill
targets companies as opposed to individual directors and senior
managers. But, says Mr Brunstrom: “The draft Bill only says
that convicted companies will be fined, but it should also say that
jail sentences will be given to bosses found guilty of corporate
manslaughter because sometimes it is clear that an individual is
responsible.
“I am not comfortable with removing that element from the
law. If someone is responsible for a crash, they should go to prison.
If no-one can be identified as personally liable for the crash,
then the proposed new law is fine. The new law should target both
companies and individuals.”
Intelligence-led policing leads the way
A new strategy
of “intelligence-led” policing
for the roads putting road safety firmly on the social
agenda was announced by the government earlier this year.
Surprisingly, roads policing has not previously been
recognised as a core aspect of police work by the Home
Office, the organisation to which the police answer. Instead,
work has been shared between the Home Office and the Department
for Transport. However, Mr Brunstrom, head of road policing
for the ACPO, says he has made it his mission to raise
the profile of roads policing. As a result, the new strategy
does not simply highlight traffic police work, but brings
together five key policing priorities in which all police
officers will play a part.
The five limbs of the strategy announced by then Transport
Secretary Alistair Darling, then Home Office Minister Caroline
Flint and Mr Brunstrom are:
- Denying criminals use of the roads by enforcing the
law
- Reducing road casualties
- Tackling the threat of terrorism
- Reducing anti-social use of the roads
- Enhancing public confidence and reassurance by patrolling
the roads
In announcing the new commitment, the government says: “It
clearly sets the police commitment to deal with all forms
of illegal and anti-social use of the roads, including
drink-driving, speeding, dangerous or careless driving
and behaviour which is threatening to road users – including
pedestrians as well as drivers.” Mr Brunstrom says: “Intelligence-led
is part of the wallpaper of all British policing. We have
taken the national intelligence model and applied it to
road policing. It is not simply about enforcing road regulation,
it is about denying criminals use of the roads.” With
ministerial support for the strategy it will, says Mr Brunstrom,
result in a highly-visible police presence on the roads,
which is demanded by the public.
“Over the next 10 years, there will be a shift
in roads’ policing that will see it become centre
stage. Traffic policing has suffered from government neglect
and we have also not seen it as sufficiently important.
We are broadening the concept beyond that of the old view
of traffic police.” In practice, there will be increasingly
closer integration between, for example, police anti-terrorist
activities and what is happening on the street. In the
future, increasingly well-trained traffic policemen will
be focusing on anti-terrorist activities on the road – vehicle
movement – and not simply vehicle enforcement regulations.
More visible policing, along with continued operation of
the National Safety Camera Programme for cutting casualties
and deaths at collision blackspots; a national police anti-drink
and drug driving campaign; and a national police seatbelt
campaign to increase the level of seatbelt wearing, especially
in rear seats and by children, are all highlighted as key
aspects of the new road policing commitment.
Summing up the new view, Caroline Flint says: “Roads
policing is an important and valuable part of day-to-day
policing. It not only helps reduce deaths and injuries
on the roads, but reduces anti-social and criminal misuse
of vehicles and provides a reassuring presence to the public.” A
key element in the strategy is the increased use of new
technology such as Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR)
technology. Police officers using ANPR make nine times
the number of arrests and contribute to three times the
number of offenders brought to justice compared with a
conventional officer. Computers linked to a network of
more than 2,000 cameras will automatically read vehicle
number plates, check them against national files and alert
police if the driver is wanted or is a suspect. In addition,
they will aid the crackdown on untaxed and uninsured drivers,
who are frequently involved in other crimes and often have
unsafe cars that are involved in fatal crashes.
Over the next three years, the computer links will be
added to the cameras on gantries watching motorway traffic
and main routes. Police are also going to add the links
to closed-circuit systems operated by local authorities
to monitor urban main roads. The technology can check up
to 3,000 number plates per hour. |
|