FLEET SAFETY
54


Policing the Fleets


From money saving to safety issues, the National
Association of Police Fleet Managers has many roles



John Gorton

The National Association of Police Fleet Managers (NAPFM) is an association of all the police fleet managers within the UK. The organisation was set up as a point of liaison to discuss transport matters between a limited number of member forces. Since then the organisation has evolved, keeping pace with the developing professional transport environment.
The key aims and objectives of the NAPFM can be summarised as follows:

  • To support the police service and individual chief officers and a professional consultative body
  • To improve the technical competence and management skills of those responsible for police vehicle fleets
  • To develop constructive communication and liaison between police fleet managers so that by design, management skill and technical innovation may improve the cost effectiveness of police fleets
  • To influence the motor and associated industries in the production of equipment that is safe, effective, reliable and value-for-money
  • To identify and advise on the impact of legislation, industrial and other external factors on the management of police service vehicles
  • To encourage proper training and to raise the professional status of police fleet managers

The operating environment

Fleet Management is one of the most demanding activities, requiring expertise in finance, asset disposal and fleet administration
The collective UK police fleet consists of nearly 28,000 vehicles with an annual mileage of almost 1,000,000,000 miles a year. For those who like statistical comparisons, that is about five times the distance to the sun and back or 40,000 times around the world.
The police fleet annually consumes £35m in fuel and £30m in spare parts and tyres. Clearly, even small economies have the potential to translate into significant savings. The NAPFM, in association with PITO, has been successful in negotiating national agreements that have saved UK police fleets millions of pounds. This is achieved through the purchasing power and economies of scale of collective negotiation. An example of this is the national contract for tyres, which reduced the national spend by some £2,500,000 - in effect, police authorities are buying tyres at 1994 prices. In the past few years, fleet management has become a hugely competitive and complex business. With such expensive assets (each with considerable ongoing variable expense), it is a real skill to ensure that optimum value for money is being achieved.
Expenditure on police vehicles arguably reflects the highest level of ongoing expenditure, (with the exception of police pay). Fleet management is one of the most demanding activities, requiring expertise in finance, resource and contract management, purchasing, asset disposal and fleet administration, to name but a few. Most police forces have made the role of fleet manager a civilian one, recognising the need for a professional and commercial approach to managing this costly asset.


The value of transport

Vehicles are often described as "a multiplier". A police officer with a vehicle can accomplish a great deal more than an officer on foot. With the average cost of a police constable is in the region of £30 per hour, the comparative cost of providing a standard police vehicle is about £1 per hour. Clearly the motor vehicle becomes a highly cost-effective tool in maximising the availability of officers.
This multiplying effect can be further enhanced by ensuring that the vehicle matches the role that it is expected to perform. This requires very close collaboration between the users and the fleet manager and at a national level between the NAPFM and vehicle manufacturers. For a vehicle to be at its most effective it must be accurately matched to the role that it is expected to perform.
The choice of vehicle for operational police work is a highly emotive issue. Most police drivers have a view of the attributes that would make up the ideal police car. Unfortunately, a vehicle with the performance and handling of a Ferrari, the load-carrying capacity of a skip, and the constitution of a Sherman tank is not yet available. If it were, it would clearly be out of the range of a police vehicle budget.
Any police vehicle tends to be a compromise between what can be achieved with a standard (albeit modified) production vehicle and the demands of police work.

The changing environment
 
Over the past five years, the government has encouraged the concept of devolved accountability. One effect of this policy has been the reconstitution of police forces as freestanding public bodies. Each police authority is required to demonstrate "value for money" through an efficient and effective service. Accordingly, the culture as a whole has changed as it moves away from that which has traditionally prevailed in the public sector organisations, where goods and services are perceived as "free" at the point of delivery.
Police fleet management organisations have become more akin to that which prevails in the commercial sector, where the internal customer or client controls the budget and there is greater freedom of choice over the supply of goods or services. There is an increased emphasis on achievement and performance rather than style for both operational officers and for staff providing the service that supports them.

Devolvement of transport costs

Unfortunately, a vehicle with the handling of a Ferrari, the load-carrying capacity of a skip and the constitution of a Sherman tank is not yet available
Through modern fleet management practices and improved data information systems, most fleet managers have a wealth of information available to them. At the sharp end of operational policing this information is often not available or cannot be easily interpreted, therefore officers may have little appreciation of the cost of the resources that they consume.
Transport management is an activity widely recognised as deriving significant benefit from central co-ordination and economies of scale. It therefore seems a paradox to suggest that control and budgetary responsibility should be devolved and fragmented between operational command units. The key to effective devolvement of transport costs is to provide choice and flexibility to front line operational decision-makers, while maintaining an overall focus of cost-effectiveness and value for money for the organisation as a whole.

Transport devolvement in practice

Police authorities have adopted devolvement in varying degrees and use various methods dependent on the differing organisational structures and operating circumstances. A number of police authorities have developed a "leasing" approach, whereby operational managers are able to select their own mix of vehicles from a vehicle catalogue. This allows the fleet to be structured in a way that best meets local operational requirements. Each vehicle carries a fixed annual charge that reflects the cost of providing, equipping and maintaining the vehicle over its life. This system allows an element of user choice within a budget allocation.
Accidents, avoidable damage and fuel budgets are identified separately as there are all variable expenses. If a Division, through good management practice and control, makes savings in these variable costs then it is appropriate for those savings to be re-directed towards front line operational policing.
Clearly, this provides encouragement and the ability to ensure finances are directed towards the core business of policing rather than funding potentially avoidable expenditure.
The vehicle catalogue is the key to the devolvement process. The separate vehicle roles are clearly identified and against these a very clear vehicle specification can be developed. This analytical approach ensures that the vehicles accurately match their intended role and can also reduce the range and fragmentation of vehicle models.
This system has the added benefit of focusing the attention of vehicle manufacturers and equipment suppliers whom, (due to the Force's increased purchasing focus) see far greater benefits in ensuring that they are the supplier of first choice. Some suppliers have reacted to this by developing specific police specification vehicles and have taken a "one stop shop" approach to service delivery.

Today's police vehicles
The nature of police use requires vehicles of the highest standards. Due to exigencies of police use, vehicles are often driven to the limits of their design capabilities. The technical sub-committee of the NAPFM works closely with manufacturers and fleet managers to improve and refine police specification models for inclusion in the Home Office purchasing agreements.
Vehicle technology and design has advanced considerably in recent years. Modern vehicles are much safer with the advent of ABS, air bag systems and impact protection, making vehicles a much safer working environment. This emphasis on vehicle safety and related equipment is severely encroaching on the available space for police related equipment. A considerable amount of work has already been done in this area and there are many ingenious solutions to installing the equipment used by officers into their vehicles while still ensuring a safe working environment.

Emerging technology
With so much Emerging technology the Police car dashboard has the potential to look more like an aircraft flight deck than a car
Many police vehicles are already equipped with an impressive array of in-car policing technology, including radios, speed detection equipment and videos. However, the availability of technology is set to further boom in the very near future.
In-car data communication systems and on-board PCs are already in use in the UK. Such technology will allow police officers in their cars direct access to systems such as PNC and criminal intelligence records. Other technology such as satellite location and mapping systems are also well past the design stage. With so much emerging technology, the police car dashboard has the potential to look more like an aircraft flight deck than a car. Fleet managers, whose first priority is that of the safety of officers, are continually presented with a conflict of how to accommodate all this new technology without compromising the occupant safety. As ever, the NAPFM in liaison with the various Home Office departments is continually assessing potential solutions through miniaturisation and the application of emerging technology.

By John Gorton at the NAPFM

 

 

 

<<back to contents page